Sunday, March 1, 2009

Age Barriers: Chill vs. Creepster

http://www.bagofnothing.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/cowbell.jpg
Over the weekend I caught a concert in which one of my old buddies that is still in high school was headlining. Having just graduated last year myself I still have a bunch of friends that were lower-classmen from my days in school, I hung out with them and had a good time catching up. It had crossed my mind a few times that aside from a few parents and people operating the venue that it was a purely high school scene and that I was a little out of place. I didn't give it too much more thought however, good music and good friends will remedy any social qualms. Yet something was still off about the crowd and as I payed more attention I became aware of this guy (who ended up being a couple years older than myself) who seemed a bit nervous. skiddish even, who would work his way methodically through the crowd shaking hands and introducing himself. I kept an eye on him all night and when it came my turn to bear the brunt of small talk I grilled him on who he was and what his story was and what he was all about. Needless to say he was sufficiently awkward, it turned out he was fairly new in town and seemed like he was just making friends. And perhaps in rash judgement on my own part I condemned him in my mind to be some monster or pedophile that was preying on these young kids (afterall Spokane is good for two things: Meth and Child Molesters).

Long story short I want to know your opinions on this, was that a fair accusation from my part? Or should I have given this guy the benefit of the doubt? And if this guy who was 25 was too old to watch a few high schoolers make some music then what age is the cut off? Going off that line, would my position be acceptable?

99 cent rip-off


Now, I don't mean to be "that" person that continually talks about work... but seeing as I spend more time at work than anywhere else combined, it's only natural I pull a lot of my current life observations from the restaurant world. 99 cents. A bargain, nothing that's going to put a big dent in someone's wallet, is it something to cry over? At my restaurant, it costs 99 cents to top off a baked potato with butter, sour cream, bacon and cheese. One of my coworkers told his table this, they wanted it, and when the food was brought to the table the potato was beautifully topped off, everything was going well and then the check was dropped off....and all hell broke loose. This woman freaked out because she did not know it cost her 99 cents, to which he kindly reminded her he had warned her, and her reply was "I didn't understand you. Take it off; I'm not paying for it."

...Now maybe I've just been waiting on tables too long but does this irk anyone else? She ordered it; she ate all of it, and now she wants a refund. For 99 cents. Maybe it's wrong to assume something additional might cost something extra but if it were me, I would probably laugh off my 99 cent mistake and not order it next time if I was that tight for money.. But I could tell you stories about people and what they believe they "deserve" when they feel they are wronged in similar situations.

Is this right? Or should the woman have just taken responsibility and paid the additional dollar? I've had people eat a whole meal, decide at the end they didn't like it and then want it taken off their bill. Maybe I was raised goofy but if we didn't like the meal we ordered we just didn't order it next time. I don't know, is this just a silly rant or is there some underlying cultural theme?