One of the interesting things the presenter also spoke of was the "3rd Wave Feminism" movement in Medina. Medina is the city where Muhammad founded his religious society and was actually quite egalitarian. In fact women often had more rights then men. This is quite the radical thought or idea but it is actually something that is supported by the Quran. Though before addressing the Quranic quote a look at the language the Quran is written in is needed.
Within the English language, like others, words have the ability to mean a variety of things. Take for instance rape. If I were playing a video game and said that i "raped" somebody. Most would assume that I had not committed the actual act on a real individual. This theory holds especially true for Arabic. One word can have dozens of meanings within the Arabic language, this does not even include loose or rough translations into other languages. Though the Quran is only meant to be read in Arabic, translations do not play such a heavy role in the Muslim world.
Returning to the evidence at hand that will both show an egalitarian society but how a sound bite society could misinterpret it. This excerpt is from verse 4:34. The first one is a translation by Ahmed Ali and the second by Majid Fakry. Remember when reading this that it is just one phrase, try imagine an entire society founded upon misinterpretations.
(These translations were drawn from Reza Azlan's book No God, But God: The Past, Present, and Future of Islam)
Within Islamic society the Quran is law not only religiously but politically. Like Christian Pastor or Pope, Islam has an Imam. These Imams are the ones who translate and tell the people what the Quran is trying to say. Unlike more liberal religions most often the Imam's word is the final word. Beyond the Imam are the Caliphs and they act on a level similar to the Pope. It is quite evident that Islam is going through a reformation, similar to that of the Christians, but they have to over come not only corrupt leaders but the language of their book. As for the movement in Medina it could be that these women are grasping the freedom they once had and trying to reinvent themselves.
1 comment:
I was thinking about the garment on friday and I had a similar thought before Megan said it out loud. It could most definitely be thought of as an opressive act, but it could also be interpreted as an honor. That women are sacred and should be kept so. It is interesting to me that women could be arrested for not wearing the right clothes though. If it was a sacred-type act, then it would seem to me that if the woman chose to break that, then she should.
Post a Comment